Understanding Medical Malpractice and Its Impact by NYC Medical Negligence Trial Lawyer Jonathan C. Reiter

What is the video about?
In this episode, attorney Jonathan C. Reiter discusses the intricacies of medical malpractice law in New York, focusing on surgical errors and misdiagnosis causing delayed treatment, especially in cancer cases. He explains the legal requirements for proving malpractice, the statute of limitations, and recent legislative changes like Laverne’s Law. Mr. Reiter highlights challenges such as ‘junk science’ in defense and the emotional toll on victims. He advocates for better compensation for emotional injuries and addresses the impact of the Grieving Families Act, which aims to provide compensation to family members for grief and emotional harm in wrongful death cases, but which has been repeatedly vetoed by the Governor.
Medical malpractice occurs when healthcare professionals act negligently, adversely affecting victims and their families. Key elements and types of malpractice cases are discussed, along with the statute of limitations for claims. Lawsuits face challenges, including finding qualified expert witnesses and persisting through the potentially long delays in prosecuting lawsuits in New York courts. Victims may experience deep emotional consequences as well as economic losses from the malpractice that may impact their ability to support themselves and their families.
What constitutes negligence in medical care?
Medical malpractice, as shown in the video, constitutes negligence by medical professionals including doctors, physician’s assistants, nurse practitioners, hospitals and other health care providers. This negligence must involve a departure from the accepted standard of care causing injury or death to the patient. Proving negligence is not enough. A causal link between the negligence and the resulting harm must also be proven.
What constitutes a departure from standard care?
A departure from the standard of care in medical malpractice means the medical professional’s actions did not follow accepted practices within the profession. It results from doing an act that a reasonable and prudent physician would not do, or failing to do an act that a reasonable and prudent physician would do. This deviation from the standard of care must have resulted in injury or death to the patient. Negligence and causation are both necessary to prove in a successful lawsuit.
How is causation established in malpractice?
In New York medical malpractice cases, establishing causation means showing that the physician’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing the patient’s harm. This involves proving the doctor’s actions, or lack thereof, resulted in the injury or death. It is not necessary to prove that the physician’s negligence was the only factor, so long as the jury finds that it was a substantial factor in causing the harm. Demonstrating a loss of chance for a better outcome is particularly important in misdiagnosis or delayed treatment scenarios.
How does misdiagnosis affect cancer treatment outcomes?
Delayed cancer diagnosis resulting from medical errors can drastically lower the chances of a successful outcome. For instance, a delay might allow a tumor to progress and metastasize to other organs and thereby decrease the cure rate from 85% to a mere 20% or less. This reduction in the probability of a positive outcome is termed “deprivation of chance.” This highlights the critical need for timely diagnosis and treatment to avoid fatal outcomes.
What is New York’s statute of limitations for malpractice?
New York’s medical malpractice statute of limitations is generally two and a half years from the date if the malpractice. However, exceptions exist, such as the continuous treatment doctrine, which delays the running of the statute until treatment by the negligent doctor concludes. In cancer misdiagnosis cases, the statute begins to run when the cancer is discovered, not necessarily when the negligent misdiagnosis occurred. There is also a discovery rule applicable to cases in which objects such as sponges or surgical instruments are negligently left in the patient’s body during surgery. Nevertheless, if the patient has a reasonable suspicion that malpractice has occurred, it is wise to obtain legal counsel as soon as possible.
#MedicalMalpractice, Negligence, EmotionalImpact, GrievingFamiliesAct, LegalChallenges
Call (212) 736-0979 and schedule a free consultation today